Skip to main content

DEMOCRACY and TOLERANCE

 

Democracy — currently the most prevalent form of government in the world in which people have a say in the legislation process — is supposed to guide a nation to correct, fruitful decisions through healthy debates and discussions.

These discussions, however, become futile when we fail to tolerate difference of opinion, which is a fundamental principle of true democracies. 

It has been customary for elected governments around the world to hit a stalemate every now and then, but then amicable solutions are brought to the table through meaningful dialogue and negotiations. 

All these measures become counterproductive when political discourse is overwhelmed by demeaning and insulting tactics instead of ethical, moral and logical reasoning.

Political leaders in a true democracy are cherished for their integrity, vision and service to their nations. However, it is unfortunate that in our case, the public tends to portray its leaders as ‘flawless heroes’ who should be considered above criticism by one and all, including those who happen to disagree with them.

In civilised societies, debates are encouraged in the media and on other platforms to help the general public form an opinion

Pakistan is currently going through several crises — monsoon devastations, a steep fall in the rupee’s value, soaring inflation, and political turmoil — that have shaken the country to the core. There is a palpable sense of financial insecurity and restlessness in society. If they continue unabated, these crises may lead to serious chaos. We need urgent, concrete measures to come out of the quagmire. But we have not even begun to work to that end.

 political tug of war has also ignited the sentiments of enmity, intolerance and violence in every nook and corner of the country.

People have become short-tempered and the threshold for brawls has markedly decreased. Deteriorating law and order, as evidenced by a rising crime rate, has also aggravated the problem.

It is high time political forces sat together and settled their differences. Leaders must promote tolerance and decency and become role models for their followers instead of locking horns every now and then over petty things.

To sum it up, we must adopt a national approach to set the country on the road to prosperity. The clock is ticking, mind you.

                                                                                                                                                                  Published in Dawn

-Thank You-

Note: Comment for any kind of Query or suggestion.

Popular posts from this blog

US President & British Prime Ministers; A Comparison | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

US President British Prime Minister TENURE The U.S. President is elected for 4 years. British Prime Minister is elected for 5 years. DEPENDENCY The American President’s term of office is secured constitutionally: He cannot be removed before the expiry of a period of 4 years unless impeached earlier by the Congress, but it is a very difficult and impracticable procedure. The British Prime Minister, on the-other hand, depends for his term of office upon House of Commons. He continues in office as long as he enjoys the support of the majority party in the House. He must vacate his office, as soon as the confidence reposed in him by the majority is withdrawn. MODE OF ELECTION The American President is directly elected by the people. The British Prime Minister is appointed by the Monarch from the majority party in the House ...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...