Skip to main content

Geo-political Checkboard

 



Momentous developments spearheaded by China’s dramatic rise, growing Sino-US rivalry, an assertive Russia, and the emergence of new centers of power in Asia, Africa and Latin America are reshaping the global geopolitical chessboard. These developments portend the advent of a multipolar world in place of the bipolar world marked by US-USSR rivalry during the Cold War and the relatively brief period of US unipolarity after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

It is evident that as China and other emerging economies in Asia catch up with the Western world in terms of economic and technological strength and military power, the center of gravity of global geopolitics will shift to Asia.

A study by PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2017 forecast that by 2050 both China and India will be the first and the third largest economies in the world with the US relegated to second position.

Out of the 32 largest economies in the world, it is predicted that 12 will be from Asia with a cumulative GDP accounting for 44pc of the world GDP.

With the increase in economic strength, Asian countries’ military power is also likely to witness rapid growth. It is expected, for instance, that China’s military expenditure would exceed that of the US by 2035.

Indo-Pacific region will be the main arena for competition for global supremacy and regional hegemony, leading to growing tensions and localized conflicts in the area, especially in the East China and South China Seas.

The convergence of the interests of the US and India in containing the expansion of China’s power and influence will strengthen their strategic partnership pushing Pakistan closer to China to maintain a strategic balance in South Asia. One can therefore anticipate growing tensions between China and India, on the one hand, and between India and Pakistan, on the other. US-China rivalry will also lead to growing competition between the two countries

Geopolitics is a brutal game played by nations for power and influence in pursuit of their perceived national interests. In the modern world, economic strength and scientific and technological advancement are the most important ingredients of national power and provide the base for the development of military power.

Unfortunately, Pakistan’s policymakers have often misunderstood the play of geopolitical forces at the global and regional levels

Our India and Kashmir policies, in particular, lack realism and suffer from strategic confusion.

It is imperative that we anchor our foreign and security policies in sound strategic realities at the global and regional levels. Further, we need to reorient our external policies gradually towards Asian countries in view of their growing importance. Above all, we must build up our national power, especially economic and technological strength, instead of relying on foreign crutches or merely on legal and moral arguments.

                                                                                                                                                                  Published in Dawn

-Thank You-

Note: Comment for any kind of Query or suggestion.

Popular posts from this blog

US President & British Prime Ministers; A Comparison | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

US President British Prime Minister TENURE The U.S. President is elected for 4 years. British Prime Minister is elected for 5 years. DEPENDENCY The American President’s term of office is secured constitutionally: He cannot be removed before the expiry of a period of 4 years unless impeached earlier by the Congress, but it is a very difficult and impracticable procedure. The British Prime Minister, on the-other hand, depends for his term of office upon House of Commons. He continues in office as long as he enjoys the support of the majority party in the House. He must vacate his office, as soon as the confidence reposed in him by the majority is withdrawn. MODE OF ELECTION The American President is directly elected by the people. The British Prime Minister is appointed by the Monarch from the majority party in the House ...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...