Skip to main content

Judicial System in France | Salient Features | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

 


SALIENT FEATURES OF JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN FRANCE

1. Subordinate Position of Judiciary:

The principle of separation of powers did not find favor with the framers of the French Constitution. As such, in the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, Judiciary has been given a subordinate position, subordinate to the executive. The composition of the Judiciary has been left in the hands of the Government. Judges in France work under the Minister of the Judicial Department. However, after the creation of the Higher Council of Magistracy and a special statute for the membership of the judicial bodies, the independence of the Judiciary has been somewhat strengthened.

2. Codified Laws:

A special feature of the French Judicial System is the existence of laws in the form of codes. The credit for the codification of all the laws goes to Napoleon for it was he who ordered the codification of all laws of France.

The law codes of France are of the following five types:

1. Penal Code,

2. Civil Code,

3. Commercial Code,

4. Criminal Procedure Code, and

5. Civil Procedure Code.

3. No Separate Courts for Civil and Criminal Cases:

Unlike the practice being followed in India and Britain where separate courts for civil and criminal cases exist, in France each court can hear both civil and criminal cases. Only one court, the Cassation Court is an exception to this rule.

 

4. Principle of College-ability:

Another feature of the French Judicial System is that here the system of hearing cases by a minimum of three judges prevails. In every court, several judges collectively hear the case and give judgement. This is known as the principle of college-ability. This principle has been accepted in view of the French belief that one judge and not a number of them can be corrupted.

5. Difference between Ordinary Laws and Administrative Laws:

In sharp contrast to the practice prevailing in India and Britain, two categories of laws operate in France-one for ordinary citizens and the other for government servants. Ordinary citizens are under ordinary laws and ordinary courts while the civil servants are under the Administrative law and the administrative courts. Thus, in France, a distinction is made between ordinary citizens and government servants. Dicey believes that this constitutes a violation of the principle of the Rule of Law.

6. Difference between Ordinary (Judicial) Courts and Administrative Courts:

Corresponding to the existence of two separate systems of laws for ordinary citizens and administrative officials, there are in operation two types of courts—Ordinary courts and Administrative Courts. Ordinary courts decide cases involving ordinary citizens and Administrative Courts decide cases involving government servants. The former apply ordinary law and the latter administrative law.

7. Right of Judicial Review with the Constitutional Council:

Contrary to the practice prevailing in India and America, the right of judicial review has not been given to regular courts in France. On the other hand, this right has been given to a special council—the Constitutional Council. This Council is a semi-executive and semi-judicial body.

8. Special Courts:

Another feature of the French judicial system is that there exist some special courts which resolve several specific disputes through compromises and agreements. These can be compared to the Arbitration Tribunals operating in other countries.

These special courts include:

(i) The Courts of the Justices of Peace,

(ii) Industrial Disputes Tribunals,

(iii) Commercial Tribunals, and such other courts.

 

9. Judgeship is a Profession:

In France, judges are not appointed from amongst the lawyers. A student of Law in France has to choose for himself whether he would like to become a lawyer or to embrace the profession of a judge. Judgeship is a separate profession in France. For the appointment of judges, there exists a Higher or Superior Council of Judiciary.

10. Standing Judiciary:

A novel feature of the French Judiciary has been the institution of Standing Judiciary. Standing Judiciary is a department of the State Attorney which is a part of the Law Department. Standing Judiciary consists of civil officers who strictly follow the orders and directions of the Law Ministry and the State Attorney.

It represents the interests of the state. In fact, officers of the Standing Judiciary can be favorably compared with the public prosecutors of India or in some ways; they can be compared with the Procurators who used to work under the constitution of the erstwhile USSR. From a study of the features mentioned above, it becomes apparent that the French judicial system is a unique system

 

Popular posts from this blog

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...