Skip to main content

Hurdles On Our Way To Becoming Truly Independent Country | Essay

 


HURDLES ON OUR WAY TO BECOMING TRULY INDEPENDENT COUNTRY

Or

UNVEILING TRUE INDEPENDENCE: PAKISTAN'S STRUGGLE AGAINST MULTIPLE THREATS

Or

PATH TO SOVEREIGNTY: PAKISTAN'S JOURNEY TOWARD GENUINE INDEPENDENCE

Or

THE QUEST FOR TRUE INDEPENDENCE: OVERCOMING CHALLENGES IN PAKISTAN

Or

REDEFINING SOVEREIGNTY: PAKISTAN'S PURSUIT OF GENUINE AUTONOMY

 

          I.            Introduction:

" None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free"

Thesis Statement:

Although Pakistan is facing an existential threat from India, the economic threat from predatory capitalism, and the cultural and technological threat from the West due to Western orientalism, the dysfunctionality of domestic institutions, and non-vibrant foreign policy, all is not lost yet as Pakistan policy, all is not lost yet as Pakistan emerges as a truly independent country by revisiting its economic, political educational, strategic and administrative policies.

         II.            What are the defining features of a truly independent country?

Strong defense for securing national interests.

Political, social, and cultural sovereignty.

Economics self-sufficiency.

       III.             Pakistan is already a truly independent country: country narrative.

      IV.            Pakistan is not a truly independent state:

1.       Perpetual existential threat posed by quasi-anarchic Indian foreign policy.

2.       Multi-national corporations and international economic institutions are dictating our economic policies.

3.       Flames of egocentrism are being fanned by NGOs and INGOs leading to a conical mentality.

4.       Our, foreign policy is not independent.

5.       As a nation, we are dependent on technologically advanced countries for research and development.

6.       On an individual level, people are not independent due to a lack of respect for human rights and women's rights in society.

        V.            Stumbling blocks In our way to becoming a truly independent country.

1.       As a nation, we are reactive rather than proactive because we live in the nostalgia part.

2.       Economic exploitation by predatory capitalism of core countries. Experts from Confession of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins.

3.       Myopic foreign policy

4.       Political instability:

Excerpt from the state of Martial rule by Ayesha Jalal.

5.       Dys-functionality of institution delayed justice and spineless bureaucracy.

Thesis from Why Nations Fail by Robinson.

6.       Lack of scientific and. religious progress due to the absence of ijtihad and research.

7.       Marginalization of half population women.

      VI.            How can Pakistan emerge as a truly sovereign state?

1.             Economic stability by widening the tax net, progressive taxation, and improving exports.

2.             Aptly doing strategic calculations for geo-economic strategic and political gains

3.             Focusing on human development and managing youth bulge.

4.             Strengthening of democratic culture and supporting progressive writers.

5.             Overhauling of administrative institutions.

6.             Utilizing media for mobilizing means in favor of national unity, ijtihad, and patriotism.

7.             Improving education, research culture, and information technology fields

    VII.             Conclusion:

Not gold but only men can make a people great and strong

                                                                     (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

After the 9/11 terror episode, America launched. Operation Enduring Freedom warned Pakistan that the USA would dash Pakistan to the Stone Age in case of non-compliance with American foreign policy in South Asia George W. Bush. Historically remarked either you are with us or against us this flashback vividly explains the importance of the foreign policy of Pakistan. This episode also leads to certain questions is Pakistan a truly sovereign country and what are the defining features of a truly independent country? Answers to all these questions are clear. Although Pakistan is an independent country it is not truly an independent one in the true sense of independence due to perpetual existential threat from India, more or less dictated foreign policy, and oiling domestic economy. It is also facing economic threats from predatory capitalism and cultural threats from the West foreign policy is non-vibrant and domestic politico-economic institutions are dysfunctional.

However, all is not lost yet as Pakistan can emerge as a truly independent country by revisiting its economic, political, educational, strategic, and administrative policies.

There are certain distinct standards that a country must fulfill to be counted as a truly independent country. A country must have territorial, political, economic, and institutional sovereignty and self-government. Along with these features, the country must have a strong defense for securing national defense and interests even bayonet its territorial boundaries. Economic, self-sufficiency is one of the most important features of a truly independent country standard of living, human development, ethnocentrism, and mass education are also important for true independence.

There are some quarters of ultra-patriotic Pakistan who believe Pakistan is truly an independent country. They are of the view that Pakistan has a specific territory, population, self-government, and sovereignty. According to them, only these four criteria are enough for a truly independent state All other criteria are non-exhaustive and cannot be filled even by the strongest of the nations in this globalized world. Each state has a certain degree of dependency on others. Hence, according to them, Pakistan is truly an independent country.

Historical lessons, contemporary facts, and practical manifestations paint a contrasting picture to this hyper-optimistic view. In practical manifestations, Pakistan is not an independent country in its true sense.

 

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”

(Goethe, German Writer)

 

Hence, there is, no need to be hyper-optimistic. A factual examination is required. Numerous manifestations prove that Pakistan is not an independent state. The most glaring one is the perpetual threat from the Indian side. This existential threat has increased manifold in recent times owing to the rise of the far-right. Hindutva in India. The revocation of articles 370 and 35-A of the Indian constitution is ringing bells. Four wars and arrant cross-border firing are the manifestations that Pakistan is not truly independent as its territorial sovereignty is breached time and again.

On economic grounds, Pakistan is dependent on multinational corporations and international economic institutions IMF, World Band, and World Trade Organizations. These corporations and institutions dictate their policies which Pakistan has to comply with owing to dwindling economy. The terms of these institutions are often harsh. Arundhati, Roy, an Indian activist, and writer, says that the representatives of these institutions are chosen behind closed doors and are manipulated by the first world to exploit the third world. This makes the situation worse and makes Pakistan more dependent on this mysterious institution.

In modern times, Pakistani youth do not like indigenous culture, and NGOs and INGOs portray the local culture as barbaric. Western pursuit of civilizing, the East through cultural indoctrination is coordinated by NGOs and INGOs. This leads to the colonial mentality of the people of Pakistan. McDonalization and Coca-Cola culture are in the true sense, dependent on exotic trends at the expense of local cultural patterns. This is, actually, cultural dependence and xenocentrism.

Pakistan's foreign policy is also contingent upon the whims of big international political actors. It is not independent. After the 1998 nuclear test, America put sanctions on Pakistan. There is also immense pressure to join the non-proliferation treaty. America, now the Chinese factor, dictates our foreign office. Pakistan’s foreign policy is reactive, rather than proactive due to this reason. This dependence on foreign policy points to the fact that Pakistan is not a truly independent state.

No country can be truly sovereign if it is dependent on other countries for advanced technology, in this post-industrial society Pakistan is dependent on technology. It has no social media, website, laptop or mobile manufacturing units, or IT industrial base of its own. Even, defense equipment is also imported. This proves that Pakistan is locked in research and development and hence is not a truly independent state.

On an individual level, the people of Pakistan are not independent also. The fundamental right, as enshrined in the constitution (article 8-28) is not enjoyed by all. The condition of the rule of law and human rights is sad. Moreover, half of the population is marginalized and is not participating in national life. This half represents and is constituted by the non-male sex. Rampant rape cases sexual assaults and workplace harassment are common nowadays. Hence, due to a lack of respect for human rights and women's rights in society, people are still not independent at the individual level.

What are the stumbling blocks in Pakistan's way to becoming a truly independent country? These hurdles are numerous. The most important one is Pakistanis live in a nostalgic past. The stories of past glories satisfy them, they become reactive rather than proactive. Their desire to improve diminishes with the preoccupation with stories of the glorious past. No nation can progress which is preoccupied with its poet.

Economic exploitation by core capitalist countries through the practices of predatory capitalism is a big hurdle in the progress and true independence of Pakistan. John Perkins, in his magnum opus Confessions of an Economic Hitman, explicitly writes about the exploitative nature of Bretton Woods economic institutions. Loans are given, voluntarily or involuntarily. Loans are given, voluntarily or involuntarily by showoff force, intimidating methods, and private deals with the ruling elite of third-world countries. This creates a debt trap and hence, the core countries exploit peripheral countries, Pakistan is being exploited by these countries in the same manner.

The foreign policy of a country must be vibrant for it to be independent in its true sense. However, Pakistan's foreign policy is not truly independent, it is a great hurdle in exercising true independence. History tells us that Pakistan's foreign policy has always been dictated by Western countries, especially America. It is not calculated cautiously strongmen in the domestic and mostly in international political and power corridors dictate it according to their whims Hence, it has become a stumbling block to the true independence of the country.

If a country is to enjoy and exercise its full independence, it must be politically stable. Sadly, the political history of Pakistan is replete with unstable governments. Never in 73 years of its existence has Pakistan experienced a true democratic culture. Dr. Ayesha Jalal, in the state of Martial Rule, propounds that democratic culture has never been established in Pakistan. Every institution of state must perform its function. Due to a weak democratic culture, Pakistan never emerged as a truly independent country.

The state institution also does not perform its functions well. There is a huge dysfunctionality of state institutions in the form of delayed justice red-tapism, yellow journalism, and spineless bureaucracy. Robinson, in Why Nations Fail, writes that if the state institutions are extractive in political and economic terms, nations fail and hence their independence is compromised. The nature of Pakistani institutions is not inclusive and hence it is a hurdle in progress and independence.

Scientific progress, research and development, and evolution in religious courses being taught in seminaries are compulsory elements for the progress and prosperity of the country. Sadly, there is a lack of infrastructure for research and development. Moreover, there is no culture of Ijtihad prevalent in Pakistan. This leads to the formation of two extremes one being religious fanatics and the other being the elite class graduating from elite universities. All this leads to sectarian violence, eventually compromising the progress of the country and hence the independence of Pakistan at large.

Equally important stumbling block in the independent country is the lack of women empowerment legislation and land programs in the country. Half of the population is systematically marginalized and is out of the workforce Half of the talent is wasted only due to cultural restraints. The state, according to the constitution, provides women their rights but only theoretically. This is one of the major hurdles to the true independence of Pakistan.

Given this plethora of problems, can Pakistan even emerge as a truly sovereign country? Is there any way out? The answer can be yes! “Pakistan can emerge as a truly independent country. After all, Pakistan has huge material resources, skilled youth, 5th largest textile industry, 3rd largest exporter of citrus fruits, and one of the best armies in the world. Pakistan can do wonders. It would require economic improvement. Pakistan had to increase government spending on progressive measures, widen the tax net, regulate progressive taxation, and increase net trade volume. A few decades ago, South Korea adopted Pakistan's 5-year plan and now it has a GDP of a trillion Pakistan only needs to resolve structural adjustment measures.

Pakistan enjoys a very favorable strategic location.  All it needs is well well-planned strategic part in a greater regional political game. This is an Asian Century.

Pakistan enjoys the friendship of China a superpower to all future foreign policy endeavors must be well calculated to extract maximum bounties from Sino-Pak friendship Maritime politics and Sino-Pak alliance against QUAD countries can be beneficial for the future of Pakistan. Through well-balanced strategic moves can Pakistan achieve its geo-economic political and strategic goals and hence secure for itself more independence in this anarchic world order.

By focusing on human development can Pakistan impart more valuable skills to its youth. More than half the population is young and energetic. It can prove a divide for the future of Pakistan. If managed well and given opportunities for establishing careers, youth in Pakistan can do wonders.

A nation’s strength

Not gold but men can make

A people great and strong

Men who for truth and honor’s sake

Stand fast and suffer long

(Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Hence, as the world is aging, the youth of Pakistan can be utilized for the development of the country in various arenas.

All countries need domestic political stability to exercise their independence abroad. Pakistan can achieve political stability by strengthening its democratic culture. All state institutions must perform their duties within the limits, of the Constitution. This will eventually strengthen democratic culture. By supporting the progressive writers, democratic culture can be cemented too. Their writings would be a critique of the status quo and they would serve as a check on the despotic tendencies of democratically elected autocrats. Hence; by empowering democratic culture and progressive writers can Pakistan emerge as a truly independent state.

Every country needs vibrant state institutions. Pakistan also needs them to deliver justice and civic rights to people current institutions in Pakistan are not vibrant and are unable to perform their duties smoothly. They are in essence, extractive instructions. They need complete overhauling and structural reforms. If institutions become inclusive, common citizens will be empowered. These common people can do wonders. America progressed when it provided security to the intellectual property of common people. The same should be done in Pakistan for real independence.

In modern times', media be it social, electronic, or print has become a very powerful tool for manufacturing thoughts of subjects of a state Noam Chomsky, in his book Manufacturing Consents, has remarked on the fact that media is now a propaganda machine. It can be utilized positively or negatively state of Pakistan can utilize media power to educate the masses in favor of Ijtihad and national unity Patriotic sentiments can also be aroused through media.

Education can change the destiny of nations. The Constitution of Pakistan makes it compulsory for states to provide free and compulsory education to 5-16-year-old citizens. Article 25-A was added in 2010 after the 18th Amendment. This is a landmark achievement, at least in theory state should practice it to the state should practice it too. This would create an environment of research and development in the long run. This would eventually lead Pakistan to the ranks of developed nations that have a greater literacy rate, at least greater than the 58% literacy rate of Pakistan.

The sum and substance are that Pakistan is currently not a truly independent country. The fate of Pakistan has always been contingent upon the whims of superpowers. Not only is Pakistan facing challenges to its territorial sovereignty, but all other indicators of sovereignty are also painting a sorry tale of multinational corporations dictating economic policies. India is continuously posing an existential threat NGOs are controlling public opinion in their agenda's favor, Nation is technologically dependent on another state. All this is happening due to less potent foreign policy, the exploitative nature of international predatory capitalism, political instability, and the dysfunctionality of state institutions. Pakistan can emerge as a truly independent country through economic stability, human development, strengthening democratic culture, and haling dysfunctional institutions Pakistan can emerge as the strongest nation and a truly independent state as Pakistan has great human potential, and as the saying goes, only harshest of the winds dare to touch the skies.

 

Like a sword in the hands of destiny are people Who take stoke of their situation at every age.


Popular posts from this blog

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...