Skip to main content

A LITTLE PHILOSOPHY INCLINETH MAN’S MIND TO ATHEISM, BUT DEPTH IN PHILOSOPHY BRINGETH MAN’S MIND ABOUT TO RELIGION | Essay

 

A LITTLE PHILOSOPHY INCLINETH MAN’S MIND TO ATHEISM, BUT DEPTH IN PHILOSOPHY BRINGETH MAN’S MIND ABOUT TO RELIGION.

 

Outline:

1.      Introduction

   Religion is the pinnacle of reasoning

   Thesis: While a cursory glance at philosophy may lead to atheism, a thorough exploration reveals religion as the apex of enlightenment, attainable only through rigorous philosophical inquiry.

2.      Two Paths to Religion

(i)               Unquestioned faith - Insights from Rumi

(ii)             Philosophical path with critical and logical scrutiny

3.      Why the Philosophical Path Initially Leads to Atheism?

   - Shallow philosophical understanding yields flawed conclusions.

   - Segregating philosophy from daily life results in erroneous beliefs.

   - Dismissing multiple gods is necessary for a firm belief in one God (applicable to monotheistic religions, supported by the first Kalma of Muslims).

4.      Why the Philosophical Path Ultimately Leads to Religion?

(i)               Kierkegaard's stages of human enlightenment

(ii)             Al-Ghazali's path to the ultimate truth

(iii)          Sir Syed’s arguments in "Khutbat-e-Ahmadiyah" - Examination of God's work

(nature) leads to recognition of God's word (religious)

(iv)           Pragmatic justifications

5.      Conclusion


Marxists might have declared that 'Religion is opium for the masses' but they have failed to grasp an intricate framework of religion. Religion is not a product of whimsical or wishful thinking. Nor it is the result of some sophistry. Religion is a body of prescriptions and proscriptions that incorporates divine wisdom Therefore, some may adopt a simplistic approach to blindly believe what religion presents. This might be an instant approach but fallible too. To build a strong and staunch belief in religion, one has to pass through a path that is more demanding and challenging than this philosophical path. This course has different stages though which one has to pass. Initial stages lead to a delusionary result of atheism, one has to tread carefully through these stages, for one is not vulnerable there. If one does not get distracted and continues to critically pursue the real truth, one will find the truth. The highest truth is religion. Although a little philosophy inclines a man's mind to atheism. depth in philosophy brings man’s mind to religion because religion is the highest step of enlightenment which can be reached only through a rigorous, critical, and logical approach.

The most simplistic path is to have an unquestioned faith. This blind belief has its pros and cons. Sufism mainly preaches blind faith in God but not without reason. Reasons forwarded by followers of this path include sweetness and purity of this path. They consider it as a shortcut as Rumi explained in many places in his Masnavi.

"Don't push your head too hard to find reasons Let it sway in the serene love of the Supreme Lord"

But this approach has its disadvantages. It bypasses critical examination of the veracity of any religion. It ignores the question that which religion is to be followed. Moreover, blind faith does not answer pertinent questions of atheists which can only be answered through logical arguments. Therefore, the path of unquestioned faith suits only ideal conditions but not tests of a real and plural world

The second path employs reason and logical tools to find answers to reality to the ultimate truth. Allah encourages man to employ his mental facilities to understand deep truths.

"Changes of days and nights, movement of stars and the moon have great lessons for those who understand."

Philosophy can be utilized to learn lessons in two ways: first by sensual experience and second by reasoning. Both of these methods are interconnected through logic to extract relevant lessons. Man has to skillfully interplay these two methods. The path of philosophical inquisition has a main advantage in that it builds a strong foundation for belief in religion. Moreover, it also complements those beliefs which are truthful.

Traversing through the path of philosophical inquisition leads to a preliminary stage called atheism. One gets inclined to atheistic tendencies for many reasons. Half-baked philosophical learning is the main reason. The philosophical path is usually covered by sensual experience at first. Empiricist knowledge or knowledge acquired through the senses only can be misleading. As eyes can only see what is in front of them, ears can hear only what is close enough but not what is concealed or hidden. Religion is such a concealed pearl that can only be extracted through appropriate tools. The use of sensual faculty is insufficient. One might conclude that as God is not visible He does not exist but this is the flawed conclusion. As Allah has said, “Your eyes comprehend me not." one has to employ other philosophical tools to comprehend God fully.

Islam's first Kalma provides an appropriate framework to build a strong belief in One Allah. Many Muslim philosophers have tried to decode it using difficult logical techniques, the most popular finding is that Islam first nullifies all gods and after their negation, it presents the idea of the oneness of God.

“There is no God, but Allah.”

Muslim philosophers opine that the first stage of firm belief is the negation of all worldly gods except Allah. After their negation, it is possible to build faith in the oneness of God.

Various philosophers have tried to justify the understanding of religion through philosophy. They consider that in this philosophical inquisition, religion will be the final result. Soren Kierkegaard was an Existentialist philosopher. He opined that man is unauthentic when he does not know anything about reality. When he sets out on a journey of enlightenment, he first reaches the stage of aesthetic personality. Poets, writers, and artists are at this stage. They consider beauty and happiness to be of ultimate importance. If one continues to pursue further, he will arrive at a philosophical stage where he will find, satisfaction and pleasure in reasoning. According to Kierkegaard reasoning at this stage is flawed as true reality is still unreached. If such a man continues his pursuit, he will ultimately reach a religious state where he will find absolute refuge and satisfaction. Kierkegaard believes this is the highest stage of enlightenment.

Al-Ghazali formulated a “Path to the Ultimate Truth.” He pointed out that man has many incapacities. Therefore, he cannot grasp the actual truth. To find this truth either he strives or he submits himself to the knowledge he already has. If he strives, he passes through various states. These stages provide incomplete knowledge of the ultimate truth. If one gives up at any of those earlier stages, he wrongly considers that this is the final stage. According to Al-Ghazali with progression toward truth, man becomes more and more capable of grasping higher truth. His sensual and mental faculties become stronger and more effective accordingly. At earlier stages, he has developed mental faculties so he is prone to draw false conclusions. Usually, this conclusion is an outright rejection of the existence of God. If he gives up there, he will lurch forever in the false belief. If he continues his pursuit, he will ultimately find the ultimate truth.

Sir Syed and John Dewey separately argued the importance of religion and its relationship with philosophical struggle. Sir Syed argues that all-natural things provide testimony of the existence of God but many don’t see those things in such a way. Sir Syed held that, man at his primitive stage of understanding considers that natural things have a relationship with God. But when he closely observes how natural objects function and interact with one another, he then wants to find answers and reasons behind the functioning of natural objects if he continuously and rigorously tries to find answers he will find them. His hedonism and atheism will vanish and he will understand the harmonious relationship between the work of God and the world of God. He will realize that the world of God (religion) is the true refuge of humanity. Pragmatists like John Dewey also declared that religion is beneficial to humankind. One might disagree with this notion, but when he will critically and closely analyze humankind, he will build a belief in religion.

To conclude, religion is such a precious pearl that is concealed under multifold complexities. Those complexities can be resolved only through logical and philosophical pursuit. Philosophical pursuit employs both the mental and sensual faculties of human beings. If one does not utilize those faculties effectively and efficiently, he might draw fallacious conclusions. But if he applies both faculties harmoniously and continues his pursuit fit truth with conviction and steadfastness, ultimately, he will unfold the truth of religion.

“If you will walk towards Allah, He will come running towards you."

(Hadith Mubarak)


Popular posts from this blog

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...