Skip to main content

Cowards Die Many Times Before Their Death | Essay

 

COWARDS DIE MANY TIMES BEFORE THEIR DEATH

Outline:

        I.            Introduction:

-          Thesis: The journey of a coward is fraught with numerous deaths before the final breath, as they endure the agonies of humiliation and failures.

      II.            Understanding the Layers of Cowardice: Denotation vs Connotation

    III.            The Precarious Demise of Cowards:

(a)      Lack of Courage: Each setback feels like a brush with death for the coward.

(b)      Excessive Self-Preservation: Overprotectiveness burdens the coward, making life more daunting than death.

(c)       Fading Confidence: A coward's diminishing self-belief cripples their ability to pursue ambitious endeavors.

(d)      Repeated Defeats: Regular failures push the coward to the brink of surrender long before their final resting place.

(e)      Public Humiliation: The fear of shame and ridicule haunts the coward even in life's mundane moments.

    IV.            Cowardice Across Domains:

(a)             Politics: Manipulative politicians meet their downfall, echoing Nietzsche's insights.

(b)            Military: Acts of cowardice stain reputations irreparably, evidenced by historical

figures and Islamic teachings.

(c)             Economy: Excess caution in investing leads to missed opportunities, as depicted in

"The Big Short."

(d)               Society: Cowards face social exile from both community and family dynamics, as portrayed in "Force Majeure."

      V.            Embracing Valor: The Path to Fulfillment and Legacy

    VI.            Conclusion: Cowardice offers no refuge in the face of danger; instead, it renders life unbearable.


Annals of human history beat testimony to the fact that cowardice and courage go hand in hand. Human history is replete with instances of courageous and cowardly persons. However, history treats each of them differently. A courageous person like Julius Caesar is celebrated both by history and literature while a yellow-bellied and manipulative anti-hero like Brutus is condemned in the most unequivocal terms. Philosophers, writers, intellectuals, poets, and historians heap praises on the valiant heroes but berate and denigrate the cowardly characters of history. Cowards are not only vilified after they perish but loathed by others in their lifetime also. They are censured and harshly criticized for their un-manly character. They become a symbol of shame and disgrace. Moreover, cowards remain restless themselves. They do not find even an iota of solace as they remain preoccupied with excessive self.

Each moment of a coward's life brings a new suffering for him. Further, each new suffering makes his life worse than death. He tries to evade death but the thought of dying never leaves his mind. He might increase a few moments in his life through his cowardly act but each moment of his life becomes a moment worse than death. Each moment of his extended life is filled with guilt, shame, and disgrace. Succinctly, a coward dies many times before his death because he has to face pangs of humiliation and failures in his life which are more painful than the actual death. On the contrary, as Shakespeare put it, “The valiant never taste of death but once" and continues to live on in the hearts and the minds of people.

At the very outset, the meaning of the term ‘coward’ must be expounded.

Its meaning can be either denotative or connotative. The denotative meaning of “coward” is a person who is excessively concerned about his safety and is immensely fearful of someone or something that may harm him. Connotatively, a coward is a person who does not do or say something good or something that is required for the fear that doing so or saying so, may bring harm to him. Cowards are not only those who flee the battlefield when swords shine or guns blaze but also those who acquiesce to something evil which they might stop or control. Whatever might be the interpretation of ‘coward’ or ‘cowardice’, it is an incontrovertible reality that it is the most detestable characteristic in humans as an English Economist. Adam Smith once said,

“No character is more contemptible than that of a coward."

In the preceding paragraphs, the meanings of a coward’ are briefly touched upon in the succeeding paragraphs, it will be illustrated how cowards die while they still breathe eat, and drink. Cowards die before their death because excessive self-concern, continuous failures, unceasing barrages of insult, and eroding confidence make their lives a living hell.

First, a coward dies before his death because each test, trial, and mishap in his life becomes as monstrous as death for him. Although, life is a bed of thorns for every person the brave keeps a stiff upper lip in the face of adversity. They take every bull at its horns and face every trial with fortitude and perseverance. Conversely, cowards know nothing of fortitude and perseverance. They fight shy of every difficulty and problem they come across in their lives. However, trials and tribulations spare no one. When a calamity befalls a cowardly person, he cannot bear it and hence suffers. Every hiccup looks like a mountain to him. This condition makes his life vulnerable and pitiable.

In a similar vein, the excessive self-concern of a coward makes him overprotective about his life thereby rendering his life more burdensome than death. A coward is concerned about only one thing self-preservation Gradually, this concern for self-preservation turns into excessive self-concern. It further leads to a situation where a coward becomes ever-protective about his life and himself. This situation renders his life a simulacrum of death. Sheikh Saadi, in his famous anecdotes, tells the story of a cowardly soldier who fled a battlefield. On his way back home, he was passing through a jungle when he came across the thought that a beast might kill him there. He became frightened and decided to cross a nearby river so that he could get to the valley. When he reached near the river, he once again got frightened. This time he was afraid of drowning in the river while crossing it. So, he decided to move beside the river until he came across some habitation. However, he could not stand the thought of his beheading if someone caught him for deserting the army. In brief, the cowardly soldier turned mad and died mentally without dying physically.

A coward gradually loses his confidence which incapacitates him from living an ambitious life like that of a truly alive person. As already explained, life remains vacuous and empty if it is void of vivacity passion, and ambition. The life of a coward is exactly like that. He doesn’t have any confidence in himself because he never tests his limits. He always confines himself to a safe space and therefore does not have the confidence to mark the unchartered boundaries. All progress in human life would have been impossible if Cowards had the responsibility of turning the wheels of progress. Cowards remain dead during their lives as they neither have the will nor the confidence to. act like a living person and take charge of their affairs in their own hands.

Moreover, a coward bites dust continuously before even going to a grave Success is a legacy of the valiant while failure is the fate of cowards. Success requires effort and sacrifice qualities which are unknown to a coward. A coward knows how to play safe but does not know how to play well. A batsman who is too afraid of losing his wicket can never hit a six. He can save his wicket but can never secure a victory for his team. Such a player, in addition, cannot survive the test of time and is often kicked out of the team soon enough. Further, a coward can never perform best and always remain an underperformer. His mediocrity stalls progress in his life and he faces humiliating setbacks around every comer. Too many failures in a life, like too many tatters in a piece of cloth, spoil it. Each failure rings a death knell for the life of a coward.

Additionally, the public's shame and the ridicule faced by the coward keep him on tenterhooks even before his death. Soren Kirkegaard, a Danish philosopher, paid significant attention to the concept of cowardice. For him, the life of a cowardly person becomes a stove of heathen fire because he focuses on continuous and unrelenting public disapproval and disgrace. However, great feats a person might have performed one act of cowardice pushes his life to dogs. His tremendous exploits lay waste if even one act of cowardice stains his reputation. Plato once said,

“A life of cowardice is a life of shame, and a life of shame is worse than all other things, even death". Verily, a coward dies by inches at the hands of public humiliation.

In the previous section, various dimensions of a coward's pitiable life were discussed. Moreover, it was illustrated in a logical progression how cowardice turns the life of a coward more miserable than death. In the subsequent section, multifarious manifestations of a coward's deplorable life will be elaborated. These manifestations will touch upon political, economic, military, and social facts of a coward’s life.

First, a white livered and manipulative politician is bound to fail in his political life. A politician who makes compromises on principles for fear of public backlash will lose credibility one day. For instance. Aung San Su Kyi has stuck her head in the sand on the matter of the Rohingya crisis. She has not spoken up against the horrendous crime because she fears the backlash of Myanmar’s Buddhist majority. It is cowardice on her part that has tainted her reputation. Similarly, Mir Jaffar and Mir Sadiq were coward traitors who compromised on principles for temporary gains. Despite getting benefits and leading successful lives, both traitors died in miserable situations. Nietzsche was particularly critical of cowardly politicians. He considered cowardice the deadliest sin. In his opinion, which he expressed in 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra’, man becomes a ‘Super Man’ when he overcomes all of his fears. Nietzsche further claimed that a cowardly person is worse than wild beasts. Moreover, cowardly politicians are worse still. He called them swine whose life serves no purpose but rather spread diseases and pestilence.

Secondly, an act of cowardice on the battlefield becomes a stigma for the whole life of a cowardly person. Although, a coward is loathed in every walk of life yet cowardice on the battlefield is tantamount to a crime. Every military code in the world punishes cowards. In some cases, this punishment amounts to capital punishment. It is so because a foolish act of cowardice can turn the fate of war. In Islam, cowardice is vehemently condemned. On one occasion, Allah

says in Quran, “Those who turn their backs in the field of war, invite the wrath of Allah." A person who invites the wrath of the Supreme Lord cannot live in peace. His life becomes a war that can never be won by a coward. Moreover, General McLellan was the chief of the Potomac Army during the American Civil War. Although he was a meticulous experienced general still he was a coward at heart. At the Battle of Antietam, he failed to vanquish the Confederate army despite numerical superiority. The reason behind this failure was that he ordered his troops to retreat long before the battle was over. Abraham Lincoln fired him for that cowardly retreat. General McLellan, despite his utmost efforts, could not retrieve his reputation. He spent the rest of his life in abject misery. He wrote the following in his biography.

"Each breath accentuates my pain and each passing moment multiplies my misery"

General McLellan

Thirdly, an investor who is too cautious can never make money hand over fist and his life remains sorrowful as his dreams remain unfulfilled because the life of a businessman and an investor revolves around money. If he earns enough money, he will remain happy. Conversely, if he fails to generate appreciable profits, he becomes depressed and dejected. A book little, “The Big Short” written by Micheal Lewis proves the point that a cowardly businessman can never succeed. As he fails to take calculated risks, he fails to get a higher return from his investment. As a result, he falls into a state of anxiety and loses confidence. This situation further worsens when his resources start to deplete and his life is caught up by wretchedness.

Finally, a coward faces ostracization and expulsion from family, community, and society. A courageous person inspires admiration while a yellow-bellied person draws social criticism. He cannot face his relatives, much less his friends. He becomes isolated and alone. A similar case has been exhibited in a Norwegian movie titled 'Force Majeure’. This movie tells the story of a father who abandoned his family during an avalanche on a nearby mountain. Family survived the avalanche but both wife and children lost the respect for their husband and father respectively. That person returns to rejoin his family but is shocked to find out that they don’t want him in. He, eventually, lost his wife and children. He had to live alone for the rest of his life.

At this juncture, it can be recommended that one must embrace gallantry and intrepidity to live one's life to the fullest and to survive in the annals of history even after his death. One must shun all the traces of cowardice from one's personality. It can be done by getting inspiration from the brave figures of human history. If one reads biographical accounts of such figures, one inadvertently gets inspired by their lives. This inspiration further leads to the adoption of courageous behavior Moreover, the education system and media should assume the responsibility to discourage growing cowardice in the form of opportunism among the masses. Finally, a distinction must be made between courage and reckless behavior. Both cowardice and rashness are undesirable attributes while courage, which comes in between them, is a desirable quality and hence must to promoted.

The quintessence of all discourse is that a coward spends a life full of dread. At every juncture of his life, he considers himself under the Sword of Damocles. He cannot even enjoy pleasurable moments because his mind remains preoccupied with self-concern. His life becomes full of worries and wretchedness. All looks gloom and doom to him. He falls prey to pessimism and nihilism. In brief, the life of a coward is no less a disaster than death. He dies by inches with every passing moment. His life of out-and-out objection serves a lesson to all and sundry. This lesson is:

“Cowardice does not save one’s life in the face of some danger, rather it makes life unbearable" Chris Walsh “

Cowardice: A Brief history1



Popular posts from this blog

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...