Skip to main content

Not Everyone In Chains Is Subdued | Essay

 


 

NOT EVERYONE IN CHAINS IS SUBDUED.

1.       Introduction: The Unyielding Human Spirit

2.       Exploring the Notion of Chains:

a.       Defining Physical, Societal, and Legal Restraints

b.       Identifying the Constraints of Physical Weakness, Social Norms, and Draconian Laws

c.       Understanding the Various Forms of Restraints Imposed on Individuals

3.       Historical Examples of Liberation:

Individuals Breaking Free Throughout History

4.       Liberation at the Individual Level:

a.       Stephen Hawking, Helen Keller, and Nelson Mandela: Icons of Personal Triumph

b.       Overcoming Physical, Sensory, and Political Limitations

c.       Exemplifying Courage and Determination in the Face of Adversity

5.       Liberation at the Collective Level:

a.       Humanity's Struggle Against Natural Constraints and Societal Oppression

b.       The Fight for Independence in Pakistan

c.       The Path to Gender Equality

6.       Innate Qualities Driving Liberation:

a.       The Power of Self-Belief, Optimism, Resilience, and Determination

b.       Harnessing Inner Strength to Overcome Challenges

c.       Cultivating a Mindset of Perseverance and Resolve

7.       Conclusion

 

No difficulty can withstand the courage and perseverance of man. Man is born free but everywhere he is in chains. These chains can be either constructive or debatable. Constructive limitations are meant to supplement the progress of humans while destructive ones are employed to make them submissive. These chains can be various. Physical disabilities and weakness limit the capacity of a person to cope with the challenges of the world. Some chains are imposed on humans in the form of societal norms and stereotypes. Self-belief, resolution, and optimism are the qualities that enable a person to defy all these shackles. Throughout human history, authoritarian regimes and elected governments have used draconian laws to subdue their subjects. Human history is replete with such examples where man broke the shackles that were meant to subdue him. The struggles of Stephen Hawking, Hellen Keller, and Nelson Mandela prove that nothing can withstand the determination of a person, this principle is equally applicable at the collective level as well. Man’s struggle against nature validates the veracity of the maxim that not everyone in chains is subdued. The Independence of Pakistan and the resilience of freedom fighters in Palestine and Kashmir are glaring examples in this regard. These examples prove that, indeed, not everyone in chains is subdued.

To begin with, almost every human being faces? restrictions and limitations in his life. These restrictions can be of various natures. A number of these chains hamper his ability to achieve his goals or to perform according to the standards of society. The chains of physical disabilities and weakness also perform the same task. According to the report of the World Health Organization, every 1 in 6 people suffers from some kind of physical disability. The inability to walk, talk, hear, or listen are some of the weaknesses that are powerful enough to subdue any person by enslaving him. However, some people courageously fight these disabilities and do not allow these disabilities to subdue them.

The case study of Stephen Hawking is a glaring example in this regard. He is a theoretical physicist and his contributions in his field speak volumes about his success. He is considered to be one of the great scientists of the contemporary era. However, Hawking has a rare early-onset, slow-progressing form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)' that has gradually paralyzed him over the decades. He cannot walk and also faces communication problems. Nevertheless, these chains of physical weaknesses failed to subdue him owing to his resilience and resolution. Instead of mourning about his impairments, he stood against them and used his adversaries to show the world the true potential of an individual. Therefore, it can be said that not everyone in the chain is subdued.

Another example in this regard is the case of Halen Keller. Halen Keller was born with the ability to see and hear. At 19 months old, she contracted an unknown illness described by doctors as “an acute congestion of the stomach and the brain", which might have been scarlet fever or meningitis. The illness left her both deaf and blind. However, she did not submit to these physical shackles and fought back to become the first-ever graduate, political writer, and activist who was blind. Not only this, she has also played her part in the movement for gender equality Just like Stephen Hawking, she also did not yield to the will of physical shackles and defied the traditional notion that physically impaired people cannot do anything in life. Owing to her courage and steadfastness, special education centers have become a part and parcel of the world’s education system to educate people who suffer from such disabilities. Therefore, it can be said that not everyone in chains is subdued.

Furthermore, some of the chains are on a person by the society in which he lives These chains are evolved with time as a result of social contract Some of these shackles are constructive and they are employed to ensure progress and prosperity. However, some chains also exist in the form of stereotypes which also developed alongside social contract These stereotypes are destructive as they do not allow people to exploit their true potential. They impose certain limitations on people who are irrational and do not fit according to the standards of the modern world. However, chains cannot subdue everyone, now and then people have stood up against these chains to counter their impact.

The struggle for gender equality is a glaring example in this regard. The status that women enjoy today would not have been possible if our ancestors decided to submit themselves to societal chains. The role of women in society has changed a lot in the last three centuries. There was a time when did not have permission to either cast their vote or to work outside their houses They were not consulted for their marriages and were not allowed to own property. However, they fought against these chains and gradually broke the shackles of the aforementioned stereotypes. Today, they enjoy all those rights which were denied to them a few decades ago. This was only made possible as they did not allow societal chains to subdue them.

Moreover, other than these shackles, authoritarian regimes and states that forcefully occupy other territories use draconian laws to impose restrictions on their subjects. They use the principle of rule by law to suppress any uprising and resistance against their rule. Freedom of speech and expression is discouraged and people are not allowed to choose their rulers In some cases, governments enact such laws which allow them to use oppression against the opposition.  However,  human history is replete with examples where the oppressed bravely fought these shackles levied by oppressors.

The life and struggle of Nelson Mandela is a glaring example in this case. Throughout his life, he struggled to secure the rights of black people in South Africa During this struggle, he spent 27 years of his life in Prison owing to the chains of draconian laws. These laws not only wasted the precious years of his life but also resulted in physical weaknesses. However, it was his resilience that enabled him to lead– the apartheid movement owing to his struggle and steadfastness against the chains imposed by the state. His uncanny commitment to the cause gave him the strength to defy all the restraints in his way. Today, he is considered to be the father of modem South Africa where blacks are treated equally to whites. Therefore, it can be said that not everyone in chains is subdued.

The struggle of freedom fighters in Kashmir and Palestine validates the fact that not everyone in the chains of draconian laws is subdued. The people of both areas are subjugated under the forceful occupation of India and Israel. Both these use draconian laws to strengthen their forceful occupation of the concerned areas.  However,  the vigor and vitality of the freedom movements in both these areas have increased with the passage of time instead of bowing before the chains of force and oppression, people of both areas are continuously resisting the oppression. The freedom movement would have died down many years ago if people were subdued by the chains enacted by the authorities. Therefore, it can be concluded that not everyone in chains is subdued

Similarly,  the road to independence of  Pakistan is also replete with examples where people proved that not everyone in the chain is subdued. Quaid-e-Azam struggled against the physical weaknesses and the restrictions of colonial rulers to pave the way for an independent state. Maulana Shaukat Ali Khan and Jahar Ali Khan embraced imprisonment to fight the oppression of colonial rulers. Sir Syed Ahmed through his literary contributions proved that the chains used by rulers can never subdue those who are determined and visionary. Therefore, it can be said that not everyone in chains is subdued.

Moreover, in the early years of human life,  nature restricted the movement of human beings and hindered their way of progress. It posed an existential threat to the human race during the Ice Age. The severity of nature limited the movement of humans and forced them to live in caves. The scarcity of food and resources was the by-product of the chains imposed by nature. However, human ancestors employed their mental power through innovation and creativity to fight these challenges instead of submitting themselves before nature, Their resistance ensured the survival of the human race. Therefore, it can be said that not everyone in chains is subdued.

The reason why not everyone in chains Is subdued is the qualities imbued in human beings. These virtues are the backbone of human resistance against the chains of oppression and repressiveness. Among these virtues, self-belief is of prime importance. Though the level of self-belief varies from person to person it is present in every human being. This virtue motivates a person to continuously struggle against the shackles and break them. Secondly, man is a resolute and resilient creature of Allah Almighty. It is in his nature to stand against the things which limit his capacity. Last but not least, hope and optimism are the means which keep a person motivated and give him the strength to break physical, societal, legal, and financial shackles. Any person who is imbued with such qualities can never bow before any chain.

In a nutshell, freedom is an inalienable right of every human being. However, the movement he steps into his world, both natural and unnatural forces try to subdue him in their chains. These chains can be physical, societal, or legal. Those who submit themselves in front of these shackles cannot live a purposeful life. However, some people dare to look into the eyes of these chains and break them through their resilience. Human history is replete with examples where people of different periods defied these shackles and transformed the world. Stephen Hawking and Helen Keller defeated the physical shackles and showed the world that nothing can prevent anyone from achieving what he desires. Nelson Mandela and the leaders of the independence movement of Pakistan showed the right way to fight draconian laws to secure freedom.  Man’s struggle against nature in the primitive period also speaks volumes about the fact that not everyone in chains can be subdued. Furthermore, the all-season Kashmir and Palestinian freedom struggles also bear testimony to the fact that the chains of brutal oppression cannot subdue everyone. The qualities of self-belief, resilience, and resolution along with the virtues of hope and optimism enable a person to fight the chains that hinder his progress. Anyone who possesses these qualities can never be subdued by any kind of chain.



Popular posts from this blog

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...