Skip to main content

US President & British Prime Ministers; A Comparison | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

US President

British Prime Minister

TENURE

The U.S. President is elected for 4 years.

British Prime Minister is elected for 5 years.

DEPENDENCY

The American President’s term of office is secured constitutionally: He cannot be removed before the expiry of a period of 4 years unless impeached earlier by the Congress, but it is a very difficult and impracticable procedure.

The British Prime Minister, on the-other hand, depends for his term of office upon House of Commons. He continues in office as long as he enjoys the support of the majority party in the House. He must vacate his office, as soon as the confidence reposed in him by the majority is withdrawn.

MODE OF ELECTION

The American President is directly elected by the people.

The British Prime Minister is appointed by the Monarch from the majority party in the House

DESIGNATION

The US President is the head of the State as well as of the government.

But the Prime Minister is only the head of the government.

ANSWERABILITY

The President is not responsible to the legislature for his acts, conducts and policies. The US President, moreover, does not guide the course of legislation, nor is he a member of the Congress.

The Prime Minister is answerable and accountable to the House of Commons. The British Prime Minister, on the other hand, is the leader of the House and actively participates in the proceedings for legislation.

POWER OVER LEGISLATION

The American President is helpless if the majority in the Congress is against him. He cannot get all the necessary legislation enacted.

The British Prime Minister is always the leader of the majority party and can get the necessary legislation passed. In this respect he is more powerful than the American President.

POWER OVER CABINET

The American President, on the other hand, is the boss and the cabinet members are his subordinate assistants. He is the master of his cabinet. The cabinet members are mere advisers. The adviser only advice. The President makes the decisions alone.

The Prime Minister is only the head of his cabinet. Since the cabinet includes the leading party members with considerable backing, he cannot easily afford to ignore the advice of the cabinet.

POWER OVER MAKING APPOINTMENTS

The American President’s powers of making appointments and conclusion of treaties with foreign states are shared by the Senate.

There is no restraint on the powers of the Prime Minister. All high appointments are made by the Prime Minister although formally they are made under the signature of the Monarch nor he is responsible for the conclusion of treaties with foreign states to anybody.

DERIVATION OF POWERS

The American President derives all his powers from the constitution of the USA.

The Prime Minister of Britain on the other hand, derives his powers from constitutional conventions. Theoretically all power is vested in the British Monarch and the Prime Minister and his colleagues are appointed only to aid and advise the Monarch.

 

Popular posts from this blog

Mithaq-e-Medina / Medina Accord: First Written Constitution of World / A Social Contract

 Introduction The Constitution of Medina (Dustur al-Madinah), also known as the Charter of Medina (Mithaq al-Madinah "Madina Accord") is a seminal social and political document of Islam. Mithaq-e-Meina refers to two agreements concluded between the clans of Madina and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) soon after his migration to Medina in 622.. The agreement that Mae Quraysh of Makkah with Ansar of Medina into Muslim Brotherhood is called Mawakhat. The brotherhood created strong bond among the Makkan and Medinan Muslims paving way for their commanding negotiation with different Jewish tribes living in Medina. The second agreement regulated the relations of the Muslims with the Jews of Medina. The constitution also established Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the chieftain of mediating authority between groups and forbids the waging of war without his authorization. The constitution formed the basis of a multi-religious Islamic state in Medina. The Medina Charter, arguably the first chart...

Critical Analysis on Aristotle's Classification of Government | For CSS, PMS, UPSC and Other Competitive Exams

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ARISTOTLE’S CLASSIFICATION OF GOVERNMENT   (1) Aristotle’s classification is unscientific and quantitative: It is argued that his classification is not based on any scientific principle as it lays emphasis on quantitative rather than qualitative aspect. But this criticism does not hold good Aristotle, being a disciple of Plato, could not ignore its spiritual aspect. He has emphasized the aim f the state along with his classification. Burgess has rightly said that Aristotle’s classification is spiritual rather than numerical. (2) Aristotle does not distinguish between State and Government: Criticizing Aristotle’s classification, Dr. Garner has said, “Aristotle does not distinguish between state and government, with the result that his classification is the classification of states, while it ought to be of governments. This criticism of Aristotle is not justified because the distinction between the state and the government is a modem concept”. Accordi...

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS MILITARY STRATEGIST/FIELD COMMANDER

Introduction: The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is considered the history's greatest military commander and war strategist. He fought wars for the propagation of divine message and for the defense of the nascent Islamic polity in a most praiseworthy manner by losing least in men and material and gaining most in the wars as far as the results are concerned. Holy Prophet (PBUH) achieved great successes by incurring minimum human losses. According to the book Muhammad at Medina by Montgomery Watt the intensity of war waged by and under the Prophet (PBUH) was the least in the history which can be estimated from the fact that only 1058 (259 Muslims were martyred while 799 non-Muslims were killed) causalities happened in 100 wars (27 Ghazwat and 73 Saryat) led by or fought under the Prophet (PBUH) from migration of Medina to his death (622-632). Principles of warfare as established by Prophet of Islam: Peace maker: Sulaimah bin Buraidah narrates that whenever Allah's Messenger (PBUH) appoi...